Intel Core i5-14600KF vs. Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
In diesem Vergleich von Intel Core i5-14600KF versus Intel Core Ultra 5 225F vergleichen wir die technischen Daten der beiden CPUs. Welcher Prozessor ist schneller? Hier gibt es FPS & Benchmarks in Gaming und Anwendungen. Außerdem Daten zu Verbrauch, Effizienz (FPS pro Watt) und Preis-Leistung (FPS pro Euro).
Hinweis: Unsere Links sind Affiliate Links. Wir erhalten beim Kauf eine kleine Provision, ohne dass sich euer Preis erhöht.
Allgemeine Informationen
| Günstigster Preis | ||
| Chip-Architektur | Raptor Cove (P-Core) | Lion Cove (P-Core) |
| Codename | Raptor Lake-S (RPL-S) | Arrow Lake-S (ARL-S) |
| Produktname | Intel Core i5-14600KF | Intel Core Ultra 5 225F |
Performance Ranking
Das Performance-Ranking ermöglicht den schnellen Vergleich von zwei CPUs und gibt die durchschnittliche Leistung in den von uns getesteten Anwendungen und Spielen wieder.
Spiele
Der Intel Core Ultra 5 225F liegt im Gaming Performance-Ranking 4.49% hinter dem Intel Core i5-14600KF
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
100 %
1%
100 %
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
95.51 %
1%
98.47 %
Produktivität
Der Intel Core Ultra 5 225F liegt im Produktivität-Rating (Multi-Core) 17.32% hinter dem Intel Core i5-14600KF
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
100 %
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
82.68 %
Spezifikationen
| Kerne (Gesamt) | 14 | 10 |
| Threads | 20 | 10 |
| Anzahl P-Cores | – | – |
| Anzahl E-Cores | – | – |
| Basis-Takt | 3500 MHz | 3300 MHz |
| Takt P-Cores | – | – |
| Takt E-Cores | – | – |
| Turbo-Takt | 5300 MHz | 4900 MHz |
| Turbo P-Cores | – | – |
| Turbo E-Cores | – | – |
| Gesamter L2-Cache | 20 | 22 |
| Gesamter L3-Cache | 24 | 20 |
| Fertigung | Intel 7 | TSMC N3B |
| Leistungsaufnahme (TDP) | 125 Watt | 65 Watt |
Mainboard-Kompatibilität
| Sockel | Intel 1700 | Intel 1851 |
| Chipsatz-Eignung | B660, B760, H610, H610E, H670, H770, Q670, Q670E, R680E, Z690, Z790, W680 | B860, H810, Z890, W880 |
| Chipsatz-Interface | DMI 4.0, 16GT/s (PCIe 4.0 x8) | DMI 4.0, 16GT/s (PCIe 4.0 x8) |
| PCIe-Lanes | 20 | 24 |
RAM-Kompatibilität
| Speichertyp | DDR4 | DDR5 |
| Speicherkanäle | Dual Channel | Dual Channel |
| RAM-Geschwindigkeit | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600 |
| ECC-Unterstützung | ❌ | ❌ |
Grafik
| iGPU | ❌ | ❌ |
| iGPU-Modell | – | – |
| iGPU-Takt | – | – |
| iGPU-Einheiten | – | – |
| iGPU-Rechenleistung | – | – |
| iGPU-Architektur | – | – |
| iGPU-Interface | – | – |
| iGPU-Funktionen | – | – |
Sonstiges
| Freier Multiplikator | ✔️ | ❌ |
| Stepping | B0 (Spec Code: SRN42) | B0/A0 (Spec Code: SRQD2/SRVF9) |
| Temparatur max. | 100 | 105 |
| Fernwartung | ❌ | ❌ |
Spiele
Performance Rating
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
100 %
1%
100 %
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
95.51 %
1%
98.47 %

Baldur's Gate 3
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
112.1 FPS
1%
76.6 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
108 FPS
1%
73.5 FPS

Black Myth: Wukong
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
111.5 FPS
1%
92.9 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
112.3 FPS
1%
93.8 FPS

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
210 FPS
1%
139.9 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
218.5 FPS
1%
172.4 FPS

Counter-Strike 2
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
261.9 FPS
1%
162.9 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
231.1 FPS
1%
135.8 FPS

F1 24
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
237 FPS
1%
188.1 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
242.1 FPS
1%
193.3 FPS

Ghost of Tsushima
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
150.7 FPS
1%
122.8 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
140 FPS
1%
117.6 FPS

God of War Ragnarök
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
167.2 FPS
1%
128.9 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
149.4 FPS
1%
113.5 FPS

Horizon Zero Dawn Remastered
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
151.5 FPS
1%
103.5 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
144.5 FPS
1%
107.8 FPS

Satisfactory 1.0
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
120.8 FPS
1%
81.4 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
117.9 FPS
1%
81.7 FPS

Silent Hill 2
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
177.3 FPS
1%
100.3 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
164.3 FPS
1%
101.5 FPS

Total War: PHARAOH Dynasties
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
130.6 FPS
1%
79.5 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
126.7 FPS
1%
79.5 FPS

Warhammer 40k: Space Marine 2
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
137.7 FPS
1%
108.9 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
125.1 FPS
1%
94.1 FPS
Spiele RT
Performance Rating
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
100 %
1%
97.28 %
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
95.3 %
1%
100 %

Alan Wake 2: Haus am See
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
171.3 FPS
1%
120.1 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
157.2 FPS
1%
126.5 FPS

Black Myth: Wukong
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
98.4 FPS
1%
81.5 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
99.1 FPS
1%
83.9 FPS

Cyberpunk 2077: Phantom Liberty
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
106.1 FPS
1%
81.2 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
100.3 FPS
1%
78.4 FPS

Dying Light 2 Stay Human
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
123.9 FPS
1%
101.1 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
102.8 FPS
1%
82.2 FPS

Ghostwire: Tokyo
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
191.8 FPS
1%
93.6 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
164.9 FPS
1%
79.9 FPS

Indiana Jones und der Große Kreis
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
254.2 FPS
1%
179.9 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
265.8 FPS
1%
230.1 FPS

Metro Exodus Enhanced Edition
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
140.3 FPS
1%
102.1 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
150.2 FPS
1%
108.8 FPS

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
83.5 FPS
1%
62 FPS
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
74.2 FPS
1%
54.7 FPS
Anwendungen
Performance Rating
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
100 %
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
82.68 %

7-Zip (nT)
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
127603 Punkte
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
89653 Punkte

Adobe Photoshop (Puget)
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
9587 Punkte
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
9198 Punkte

Adobe Premiere Pro (Puget)
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
86157 Punkte
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
83203 Punkte

Blender
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
422 Sekunden
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
625 Sekunden

Cinebench R24 (multi)
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
1355 Punkte
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
950 Punkte

Davinci Resolve (Puget)
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
12188 Punkte
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
11011 Punkte

Geekbench (nT)
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
16274 Punkte
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
14987 Punkte

Handbrake
Intel Core i5-14600KF
AVG
61 Sekunden
Intel Core Ultra 5 225F
AVG
81 Sekunden

